519 672 2121
Close mobile menu
Published on: 12 Oct 2017 By

What is an “Accident”: A Case Summary on Dittmann v. Aviva

The recent Ontario Superior Court of Justice decision of Dittmann v. Aviva Insurance Company of Canada[1] provides an interpretation of what qualifies as an “accident” pursuant to the Statutory Accident Benefits Schedule (“SABS”). Subsection 3(1) of the SABS defines “accident” as “an inciden…

View the post titled What is an “Accident”: A Case Summary on Dittmann v. Aviva
Published on: 3 Oct 2017 By

Court of Appeal Finds in Favour of Plaintiff in Securities Class Action

A recent decision by the Ontario Court of Appeal has provided clarity on how courts should approach secondary market misrepresentation cases at the preliminary leave stage. In Rahimi v SouthGobi,[1] the Plaintiff Paiman Rahimi (represented by Siskinds) appealed a lower court decision that ha…

View the post titled Court of Appeal Finds in Favour of Plaintiff in Securities Class Action
Published on: 21 Sep 2017 By

The Environmental Law Team Welcomes Dr. Jane Sadler Richards

Siskinds is proud and pleased to announce that Dr. Jane Sadler Richards is now a member of the Siskinds Environmental Group. Jane is a scientist, an agrologist, and a paralegal. Her work focuses on regulatory issues related to environment and land, and agriculture and food production. At Sis…

View the post titled The Environmental Law Team Welcomes Dr. Jane Sadler Richards
Published on: 18 Sep 2017 By

Kitchener Company Pleads Guilty to Contravening Ozone-Depleting Substances Regulations

On September 7, 2017 a Kitchener company pled guilty and was fined $265,000 for two counts of contravening the Ozone-Depleting Substances Regulations, 1998 under the Canadian Environmental Protection Act, 1999. The fine will be directed to the Environmental Damages Fund and used for environm…

View the post titled Kitchener Company Pleads Guilty to Contravening Ozone-Depleting Substances Regulations