The five Environmental Penalty Orders give fascinating and useful guidance to how regulation 222/07 is being interpreted and applied. For example, the ministry takes a “worst-case” approach to determining whether a spill has been identified promptly. Bruce Power argued that it had identified its spill within 2 hours; this was rejected since the spill might have begun earlier. Liqui-Box’s submission, seeking reductions to its penalty, is particularly well organized.
Only one of the companies challenged the MOE’s right to impose a penalty. Bruce Power contended that the intake channel was part of its power station, and that all fish in it were already doomed. Accordingly, Bruce Power argued, spills into its intake channel were not spills into protected “waters”, and cannot be punished with a penalty. The ministry decided that artificial watercourses are “waters” protected by the Ontario Water Resources Act, regardless of the inevitable death of the fish within them, and imposed the penalty anyway.