519 672 2121
Close mobile menu
Showing 1221 - 1230 of 1699
Published on: 22 Oct 2009 By (Dianne Saxe)

New brownfields standards coming soon

Ministry of the Environment staff are seeking approval for proposed changes to the brownfields regulation, 153/04. Last year, the MOE proposed far-reaching changes, including: much more stringent generic cleanup standards, to be phased in 12 months later, a more flexible Tier 2 for risk assessment,

Continue reading the post titled New brownfields standards coming soon
Published on: 9 Jan 2015 By

The New Reality โ€“ Summary Judgment Motions

Following a recent decision, Michael Polvere describes why the old adage “I’ll get my day in court”, in the traditional sense, has changed. While much has been written by lawyers, and between lawyers, about the ground breaking case, Hryniak v Mauldin,[1] which was decided by the Supreme Court of Canada in January of this year;...

Continue reading the post titled The New Reality โ€“ Summary Judgment Motions
Published on: 7 Mar 2014 By

Towards a New Class Action Certification Costs Framework?

Introduction In a succession of decisions issued in November 2013, Justice Belobaba articulated a new framework for determining the appropriate level of costs to be awarded on class action certification motions.1ย  Citing the fundamental objective of access to justice, Belobaba J. expressed a preference for a no costs regime in class proceedings.ย  His Honour indicated...

Continue reading the post titled Towards a New Class Action Certification Costs Framework?
Published on: 7 Mar 2013 By

Has the Time Come to Amend Section 2(3)

Is it time to abandon the ninety-day rule? Has the Time Come to Amend Section 2(3) (the โ€œNinety-Day Ruleโ€) of the Class Proceedings Act, 1992? Section 2(3) of the Class Proceedings Act, 1992 (CPA) requires that a certification motion be made โ€œwithin ninety days.โ€1 The timing of the certification motion, the central focus of much...

Continue reading the post titled Has the Time Come to Amend Section 2(3)
Published on: 5 May 2010 By (Dianne Saxe)

Environmental penalties gaining steam

Ontarioโ€™s environmental penalties regime for spills is gathering steam. The final count for 2009 was 13 penalties totalling $112,143.20, most under the Environmental Protection Act. The highest penalty was $23,750. Thirteen more penalties have already been issued in the first four months of 2010, totalling $77,003.

Continue reading the post titled Environmental penalties gaining steam
Published on: 13 Oct 2010 By (Dianne Saxe)

Climate change: How strong is the evidence?

Is climate change science “real science”? Can climate change experts give expert evidence in court? Canadian courts have not yet wrestled with this issue, but American courts have. The leading case isย Green Mountain Chrysler v. Crombie. In 2007, the auto industry tried to prevent leading climate change experts from giving expert evidence, on the ground...

Continue reading the post titled Climate change: How strong is the evidence?
Published on: 6 Oct 2011 By (Dianne Saxe)

Pollution from distant source a nuisance?

The legal category of nuisance may be easier to use for long distance air pollution after a recent comment by the Ontario Court of Appeal. Inย Antrim Truck Centre Ltd. v. Ontario (Transportation), 2011 ONCA 419 (CanLII), Justice Epstein ruled that nuisance claims can be successfully made, no matter the distance between the source and the...

Continue reading the post titled Pollution from distant source a nuisance?