519 672 2121
Close mobile menu
Showing 481 - 490 of 1685
Published on: 6 Jan 2021 By

The SEC crackdown on crypto-securities: SEC v. Ripple

Itโ€™s a busy new year for lawyers representing Ripple Labs Inc. (โ€œRippleโ€), as they prepare to face off with American regulators in the โ€œCryptocurrency Trial of the Centuryโ€. On December 22, 2020, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission launched an action against Ripple Labs Inc. and two of its executives alleging the violation of federal...

Continue reading the post titled The SEC crackdown on crypto-securities: SEC v. Ripple
Published on: 26 Jan 2022 By

TL;DR โ€“ Who reads the Terms of Use?

Business owners: do you think your customers read your websiteโ€™s Terms of Use? Probably not. However, you probably want your customers to read it. Afterall, the Terms of Use sets out the backbone of your legal relationship with your websiteโ€™s visitors. Throughout the years, Terms of Use have become so long and so technical that...

Continue reading the post titled TL;DR โ€“ Who reads the Terms of Use?
Published on: 15 Feb 2013 By

Four Ways to Be a Better Neighbour: London By-Laws and How They Affect You

Although most of us are lucky enough to live next door to reasonable and friendly people, living in a City means that sometimes we get in each otherโ€™s way. If you are building a fence, have a dog or a pool or are planning a big backyard party there are some rules and by-laws you...

Continue reading the post titled Four Ways to Be a Better Neighbour: London By-Laws and How They Affect You
Published on: 11 May 2018 By

Siskinds files proposed class action against Facebook

Note: This article was also publishedย on AdvocateDaily.com By Rob Lamberti, AdvocateDaily.com Contributor A class-action lawsuit filed by Siskinds LLP against Facebook continues to collect plaintiffs who may have had their data scraped by Cambridge Analytica through an app on the popular social media platform, says London, Ont. privacy lawyerย Peter Dillon. The lawsuit represents at least...

Continue reading the post titled Siskinds files proposed class action against Facebook
Published on: 11 May 2017 By

Class Action Case Comment: Vester v Boston Scientific Ltd., 2017 ONSC 1095

Background The Defendants, Boston Scientific Ltd. and Boston Scientific Corporation (collectively โ€œBoston Scientificโ€) designed, manufactured and sold transvaginal mesh (โ€œTVMโ€) medical devices that were implanted into thousands of Canadian women for the treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence (โ€œSUIโ€) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse (โ€œPOPโ€). SUI is the involuntary leakage of urine on effort or exertion, such...

Continue reading the post titled Class Action Case Comment: Vester v Boston Scientific Ltd., 2017 ONSC 1095
Published on: 29 Jun 2016 By

Court grants defendant injunction and inspection order to investigate plaintiffโ€™s property

In 2014, Metrus Properties sued Wrigley Canada claiming Wrigleyโ€™s neighbouring property had contaminated its property. When Wrigley asked to access the Metrus property to conduct environmental tests, Metrus refused.ย In April of 2016, the Superior Court of Justice granted an injunction to temporarily prevent Metrus from redeveloping its property and also ordered access to Metrusโ€™s property...

Continue reading the post titled Court grants defendant injunction and inspection order to investigate plaintiffโ€™s property
Published on: 7 May 2015 By

OCA Clarifies Franchisor Disclosure Obligations

After getting off to a shaky start, the Ontario Court of Appeal seems to be finding its feet in the interpretation of franchisorsโ€™ disclosure obligations as mandated by the Arthur Wishart Act (Franchise Disclosure) 2000, S.O. 2000 c. 3, and its General Regulation. In the case ofย Caffรฉ Demetre Franchising Corp. v. 2249027 Ontario Inc., 2015...

Continue reading the post titled OCA Clarifies Franchisor Disclosure Obligations
Published on: 2 Nov 2016 By

ERT concludes turbine project will cause serious harm to human health

The Environmental Review Tribunal (โ€œTribunalโ€) has for the first time concluded that a wind turbine project would cause serious harm to human health. The Tribunal also concluded, as it did in an earlier case, that the project would cause serious and irreversible harm to an endangered bat species, specifically the little brown bat. The facts...

Continue reading the post titled ERT concludes turbine project will cause serious harm to human health